IT’S HAPPENING. 🏛️🚨 House votes to SUBPOENA Pam Bondi over Epstein files. Five Republicans BROKE RANKS ranks to join Democrats in a 24-19 vote to compel Bondi to testify about the DOJ’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. What are they hiding in those files? It’s time for the truth UNDER OATH.

IT’S HAPPENING. 🏛️🚨 House votes to SUBPOENA Pam Bondi over Epstein files.

Five Republicans BROKE RANKS ranks to join Democrats in a 24-19 vote to compel Bondi to testify about the DOJ’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.

What are they hiding in those files? It’s time for the truth UNDER OATH.

**Washington, D.C. —** In a dramatic bipartisan move, the House Oversight Committee voted 24–19 to subpoena Pam Bondi, demanding that the U.S. attorney general testify about the Department of Justice’s handling of records tied to the investigation of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. The vote marks a rare moment of political crossover, with five Republicans joining Democrats to compel Bondi to appear before the committee under oath. ([NBC New York][1])

The subpoena motion was introduced by Republican Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, who has been openly critical of the Justice Department’s management and release of Epstein-related documents. Lawmakers supporting the measure argue that key evidence and records tied to Epstein’s global sex-trafficking network remain undisclosed, raising serious concerns about transparency and accountability. ([mint][2])

Several Republican members broke ranks to support the motion alongside Democrats, including Tim Burchett of Tennessee, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Michael Cloud of Texas, and Scott Perry of Pennsylvania. Their votes helped push the measure past opposition within the Republican-led committee and signaled growing bipartisan frustration over the Justice Department’s handling of the case. ([NBC New York][1])

The subpoena seeks testimony about the Justice Department’s compliance with the **Epstein Files Transparency Act**, a law requiring the release of investigative records related to Epstein while protecting victims’ identities. Critics in Congress claim that millions of pages of documents, as well as possible audio and video evidence, may still be missing or withheld from the public. ([mint][2])

If she complies, Bondi will be required to testify before the committee about the department’s decisions regarding the release, redaction, and management of Epstein-related files. The testimony could become a major political and legal moment, as lawmakers from both parties continue pressing for answers about one of the most controversial criminal cases in recent U.S. history.

For many in Congress and the public alike, the central question remains: **what information about Epstein and his network has yet to be revealed—and why